Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Gigante vs Mitchell Krueger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gigante vs Krueger analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Gigante vs Mitchell Krueger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 0 Krueger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gigante has won 50.36% of points on their second serve, while Krueger has won 52.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gigante, in recent form, has won 51% of their opponent's second serve points, while Krueger has won 51.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 31.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gigante has saved 60.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Krueger has saved 58.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gigante has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Krueger winning 57.35% (W/L 39/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 40/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20). Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.23% of matches (W/L 36/ 16), where as Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.41% of matches (W/L 31/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gigante winning 1 times and Krueger being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Krueger winning 1. The last match between Gigante and Krueger was at the Tenerife 3 Challenger, 28-02-2024, Second, Hard with Matteo Gigante getting the victory 4-6 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gigante and Krueger have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gigante winning 1 times and Krueger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gigante winning 1, and Krueger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gigante has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.21 while Krueger has played against players with an average rank of 269.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gigante has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Krueger has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gigante has converted 43.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Krueger has converted 41.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
138
Rank
137
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
251
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
59% (127-87)
Career Total W/L
53% (404-358)
70% (26-11)
YTD W/L
63% (24-14)
$70,440
Career Prize Money
$697,038
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:25 | 2:31:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (65/122) | 75% (79/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (45/65) | 65% (51/79) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (31/57) | 62% (16/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (38/105) | 38% (46/122) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
65 of
122)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (26/11) | 63% (24/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (53/34) | 62% (55/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (432/375) | 53% (484/436) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (18/3) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 157 | 166 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 162 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:51 | 1:53:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.08 | 316.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1587/2572) | 65% (1828/2807) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1096/1587) | 70% (1272/1828) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (496/985) | 52% (512/979) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (119/273) | 41% (112/272) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1062/2582) | 40% (1191/2983) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 84% (21/4) | 68% (23/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (26/37) | 63% (24/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 67% (16/24) |
| Deciding Set W% | 92% (12/13) | 46% (6/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 91% (23/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 9% (23/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 41% (17/7) | 20% (15/3) |
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Matteo Gigante
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
12
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Gianluca Bellezza
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Matteo Gigante
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Matteo Gigante
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Alexis Galarneau
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Gigante Vs Krueger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
